Thursday, June 23, 2016

California May Demonstrate What Government Can Do to Religion

One would think, after reading the First Amendment, that government would let Christian colleges teach in a way that is true to their Christian beliefs. This is even more logical if you think about the fact that students are going to be aware of the tone of the college before they enroll. But read the article linked below to see what reality can be like:

Monday, April 25, 2016

How Christianity Helped Create Our American Democracy

I have written many times in this blog about the connection between Christianity (and religion in general) and our country's founding. I have mentioned Alexis de Tocqueville in a few posts. Now the Heritage Foundation has written a very nice article about this connection.

Here is a teaser from that article:

"Today, as conservatives continue to fight for religious liberty, we might recall not only individual rights to religious liberty, but religion’s essential feature for the preservation of our political order."

Please read the whole article when you have a minute (it's not very long):

Sunday, December 7, 2014

Military Increasingly Intolerant of Christianity?

Here is a post from Todd Starnes' Facebook page. It doesn't need a lot of comment.

I just received an email from one of our readers who was on board a military transport. He was reading a copy of my book, "God Less America." 

He told me an officer scolded him for reading the book and ordered him to put it away. She accused him of attempting to proselytize while on board a military aircraft.

The reader did as he was told. Later in the flight he began reading on his Nook. The same officer demanded to know what he was reading. 

"So long as it's not the same book, I'm satisfied," she said.

This is what I meant when I wrote in "God Less America" that President Obama was turning our military into a social engineering petri dish.

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Is the Current Administration Guided by Our Founders?

This is only one of many examples, some of which can be found within either party, of the federal government taking too much power and done so in an unconstitutional manner.

Recently, the President and Congress got together (in this case, all Democrats) and decided to exempt Congress and Congressional staff from much of what is required in the Affordable Care Act (AFA, or "Obamacare"). This is something the act seems to specifically disallow.

But more important, our government is supposed to be guided by the Constitution. And in order to truly understand the Constitution, one should also understand the Federalist Papers, which were a sort-of discussion among some Founders of what the then-upcoming Constitution should do. James Madison ("father of the Constitution") said this in Federalist 57:

"I will add, as a fifth circumstance in the situation of the House of Representatives, restraining them from oppressive measures, that they can make no law which will not have its full operation on themselves and their friends, as well as on the great mass of the society. This has always been deemed one of the strongest bonds by which human policy can connect the rulers and the people together. It creates between them that communion of interests and sympathy of sentiments, of which few governments have furnished examples; but without which every government degenerates into tyranny. If it be asked, what is to restrain the House of Representatives from making legal discriminations in favor of themselves and a particular class of the society? I answer: the genius of the whole system; the nature of just and constitutional laws; and above all, the vigilant and manly spirit which actuates the people of America -- a spirit which nourishes freedom, and in return is nourished by it." (emphasis mine)

How many of our current members of Congress and the Executive Branch have every read the Federalist Papers? How many of them refer back to those documents now and then? My estimates would be a very small number.

Thursday, April 19, 2012

God vs. Copyright vs. Public School Teacher... AGAIN

The previous post in this blog was about public school officials who changed a famous song, God Bless the USA, to remove the word "God." This, of course, is a violation of U.S. Copyright law. But it's also just plain silly that the school somehow believed it inappropriate to utter "God" in a public school. Our history is rich with references to God and it is clear our Founders had no intention of removing God from public life when they wrote the Constitution. (Thomas Jefferson, from whose letters we get the phrase "Separation of church and state," and who is typically regarded as one of the "least Christian" of our Founders, even approved the use of the Bible and the Watts Hymnal for practice reading in Washington, D.C. public schools.)

Now another similar issue has arisen in Albemarle County’s Broadus Wood Elementary School (Virginia). A 5th-grade school teacher wanted to use the song We Are the World in a school performance. But, apparently thinking that "God" may not be mentioned in school, she altered this line:

We are all a part of God’s great big family

so that it became this:

We are all a part of one great big family

And she dug a little deeper in verse three of the song, changing this line:

As God has shown us by turning stones to bread

to this one:

We can’t let them suffer; no we cannot turn away

One has to wonder what this same teacher would do if students were studying the Declaration of Independence. Would she change "endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights" to simply say "endowed with certain inalienable rights"? Our Founders knew that if our rights come from man rather than God, then man (or a teacher) can take our rights away.

Read the full story on the site below: